HP ENVY 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ENVY 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 22A0
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 04:56
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4712HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 127
57% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 177
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
HP(103C 22A0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3270
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 17.6
15% 17.1 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 15.5
13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 212 407 427 426 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 446
Write 393
Mixed 393
SusWrite 319
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 22.1
98% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 80.7
100% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 102%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 123GB
106GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8.4 13 11 14 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 13.4
Mixed 12.6
SusWrite 11.7
20% 16 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.6
175% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP687515-H66-MCN Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 15.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback