Gigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081230
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 23:25
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9950
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 34.9
2-Core 75.1
40% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 140
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Gigabyte(1458 21FF) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.54
Parallax 6
6% 6.85 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 6.04
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
629GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 37 49 56 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 81.5
Write 74.1
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 51.5
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
110% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 59%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
218GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 86 85 88 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 76.8
Write 83.1
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 85.5
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 51%
Seagate Backup+ BK 2TB
117GB free, PID ab20
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 26
Write 16.3
Mixed 21
SusWrite 13
24% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB
403GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 17.3
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 13
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 18%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 25.3
Write 14
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 12.9
22% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14%
Great: 56%
MXT-USB Storage Device 32GB
16GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 11 11 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 7.8
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 12
14% 11 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.8
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
25.6% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.9
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA780G-UD3H Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback