Gigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081230
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJun 12 '20 at 15:34
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9950
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 32.8
2-Core 76.1
41% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 146
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Gigabyte(1458 21FF) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 3.22
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 4.7
3% 4.04 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
630GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 51 54 47 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 74.5
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 50.3
43% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 59%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
218GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 83 83 86 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 59
Write 79
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 84
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 51%
Seagate Backup+ BK 2TB
117GB free, PID ab20
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 14.8
Mixed 19
SusWrite 12.7
23% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB
403GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 15.7
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 12.7
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 18%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 17.8
Write 12
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 12.5
20% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 56%
MXT-USB Storage Device 32GB
16GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 10 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Read 12.8
Write 7
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 12
13% 9.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
27% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.7
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA780G-UD3H Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback