Lenovo 82C4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 82C4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 13:14
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 68%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 61.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 236
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 614
59% 486 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Legend(17AA 3FDC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.72% Terrible
Lighting 8.03
Reflection 9.77
Parallax 7.59
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 8.63
Splatting 15.5
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.72%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G-1101 256GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20240001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 432 421 422 425 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 935
Write 875
Mixed 815
SusWrite 429
171% 764 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 58.9
200% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 739
DQ Mixed 660
530% 746 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 161%
Great: 188%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMSA3310MJ86H9F-3200 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 8GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.7% Above average
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 18.8
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 15.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82C4 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback