Asus B75M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B75M-A  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 11:55
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 74
2-Core 158
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 299
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 048F) 2GB
CLim: 1188 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 33.1
Parallax 35.1
23% 32.2 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 35.5
26% 30.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 118 134 102 108 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 257
Write 117
Mixed 319
SusWrite 119
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 20.7
84% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 0.2
50% 124 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 0 1TB
250GB free
Firmware: 650GNA01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 113
Write 101
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 96.5
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-A Builds (Compare 626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-A - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback