Asus B75M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B75M-A  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140731
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 23:11
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 169
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 328
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 048F) 2GB
CLim: 1188 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 34.8
23% 32 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 26
Splatting 35.1
25% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 108 83 96 105 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 311
Write 200
Mixed 358
SusWrite 103
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 19.6
94% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 32.9
76% 154 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 0 1TB
254GB free
Firmware: 650GNA01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 97 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 96.6
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 78%
WD My Book 1130 1TB
208GB free, PID 1130
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 88
Write 88.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 89.8
111% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-A Builds (Compare 626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-A - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback