Vorago A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemVorago A_M_I_  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191115
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 08:37
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 200
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 266
37% 274 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.15
Parallax 1.47
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.87
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hoodisk SSD 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 338 338 348 349 346 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 402
Write 425
Mixed 333
SusWrite 352
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 38.1
161% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 191
176% 268 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback