Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '20 at 13:02
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 229
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 454
60% 448 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 38.9
38% 39.3 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 37.3
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,706
Write 1,299
Mixed 534
260% 1,180 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 53.4
212% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1094
DQ Write 1,124
DQ Mixed 709
643% 976 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
326GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 85 83 85 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 82.8
65% 88 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
45GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 42 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 46.7
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 40.8
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 41%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
30GB free
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 11 11 12 9.9 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.44% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 9.5
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 10.3
10% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
54% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.44%
Great: 46%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
71GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 40 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 47
Write 44.5
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 39.4
30% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 24.2
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $735
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback