Packard Easynote TE69CXP

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Packard Easynote TE69CXP (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EA50_CX
Memory	4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131008
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '20 at 10:12
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	50% Average	Memory 79.4 1-Core 49.2 2-Core 85.9 47% 71.5 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 120 16% 121 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 0835) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 1.27 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 2.66 1% 3.01 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 2.13 Splatting 7.35 4% 3.91 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 157 96 91 89 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 437 Write 390 Mixed 316 SusWrite 132 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 14.9 69% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 125 131% 216 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 389GB free Firmware: AX0E1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 106 108 108 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 101 Write 103 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 107 63% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 6GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	44.9% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 15.9 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 11.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Easynote TE69CXP Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard Easynote TE69CXP

CPU
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	5x
Pentium 2117UIntelBench 43%, 5,157 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	5x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	2x

SSD
Blue 250GBWD $81Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	2x
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	1x
Force LE200 SSD 120GBCorsairBench 64%, 5,441 samples	1x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	3x
HMT325S6EFR8A-PB Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 6GBUnknownBench 28%, 2 samples	1x
ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 2,133 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $81

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16