Packard Easynote TE69CXP

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Packard Easynote TE69CXP (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EA50_CX
Memory	4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131008
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 27 '20 at 14:14
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 78.7 1-Core 49.7 2-Core 88.9 48% 72.4 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 123 17% 124 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 0835) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.77% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 2.66 2% 3.46 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 2.13 Splatting 7.35 4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.77% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 134 90 91 87 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 407 Write 386 Mixed 321 SusWrite 139 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 24.1 82% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 122 135% 227 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 466GB free Firmware: AX0E1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 114 114 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 105 Write 108 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 113 65% 90 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 6GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.1% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Easynote TE69CXP Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard Easynote TE69CXP

CPU
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	5x
Pentium 2117UIntelBench 43%, 5,157 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	5x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	2x

SSD
Blue 250GBWD $90Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	2x
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	1x
Force LE200 SSD 120GBCorsairBench 64%, 5,441 samples	1x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	3x
HMT325S6EFR8A-PB Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 6GBUnknownBench 28%, 2 samples	1x
ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 2,133 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16