Lenovo 30A7000QUS

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 30A7000QUS (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150604
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '20 at 08:33
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	57%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 1,082 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 35.9 1-Core 57.8 2-Core 88.9 35% 60.9 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 249 29% 227 Pts	64-Core 292 18% 292 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3413) CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.5% Average	Lighting 49.4 Reflection 60.8 Parallax 56.1 40% 55.5 fps	MRender 62.8 Gravity 48 Splatting 51.1 44% 53.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 312GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 349 353 361 360 359 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 420 Write 348 Mixed 279 SusWrite 351 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 65.3 4K Mixed 27.7 105% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 260 218% 317 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 129%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 138 137 138 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 137 Write 136 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 137 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905625-030.A00G BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.8% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8.1 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 4.2 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 222 18% 222 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 30A7000QUS Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30A7000QUS

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	18x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	3x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	8x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	7x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	8x
860 Pro 512GBSamsung $150Bench 110%, 16,934 samples	3x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	2x

RAM
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 4x16GBHynixBench 98%, 859 samples	3x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 6x16GBHynixBench 93%, 48 samples	3x
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 3x16GBMicronBench 73%, 28 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Very poor

Total price: $863

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16