Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 16:35
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$179
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 184
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 456
47% 379 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.16
1% 1.38 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.43
2% 1.81 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 37.1
31% 35.4 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 35.4
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 46 41 43 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.9% Poor
Read 220
Write 49.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 44.6
20% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 5.5
32% 8.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
346GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.8 6.7 6.5 6.8 6.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 322
Write 5.5
SusWrite 6.6
79% 111 MB/s
4K Read 310
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
12,989% 104 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
375GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.5 4.2 4.5 4.3 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,806
Write 3.2
SusWrite 3.8
432% 604 MB/s
4K Read 306
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.5
12,795% 102 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
512GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 2,045
Write 6.2
733% 1,026 MB/s
4K Read 269
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
11,305% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 11.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX R2.0 Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback