Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 16:26
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$134
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 186
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 452
48% 385 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.19
1% 1.41 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.39
2% 1.82 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 37.1
31% 35.6 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 35.7
30% 37 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 195
Write 51.4
Mixed 49.8
21% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 5.6
32% 8.23 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
346GB free
Firmware: CC38
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,341
Write 5.2
481% 673 MB/s
4K Read 278
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
11,680% 93.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
375GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 4103
Mixed 6
1,468% 2,054 MB/s
4K Read 482
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
20,140% 161 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
512GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 2,488
Write 3.5
890% 1,246 MB/s
4K Read 207
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
8,697% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.5
Write 11.9
Mixed 12
19% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
115% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX R2.0 Builds (Compare 970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback