Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '20 at 05:01
Run Duration	368 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Memory 82.2 1-Core 152 2-Core 306 96% 180 Pts	4-Core 547 8-Core 921 89% 734 Pts	64-Core 1,152 71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217 72,993 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Gigabyte(1458 2318) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Lighting 76.4 Reflection 56.3 Parallax 110 62% 80.9 fps	MRender 54.3 Gravity 76.2 Splatting 75.2 57% 68.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 482GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 861 103 103 108 104 103 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	185% Outstanding	Read 1,478 Write 1,361 Mixed 1,028 SusWrite 230 228% 1,024 MB/s	4K Read 57.5 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 77.1 266% 95.1 MB/s	DQ Read 578 DQ Write 760 DQ Mixed 270 315% 536 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 255%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 549GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 89 89 90 89 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 96.2 Write 82.9 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 88.9 112% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 380GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 67.9 Write 58.8 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 86.3 90% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 59%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 913GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 92 87 85 90 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 108 Write 117 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 88.7 129% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.2 211% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 74%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 92 87 85 89 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 137 Write 148 Mixed 115 SusWrite 88.7 164% 122 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 74%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 7.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 183 173 171 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 182 Write 187 Mixed 110 SusWrite 176 220% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 214% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 74%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 152 149 150 149 138 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 127 Write 100 Mixed 111 SusWrite 146 165% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 65%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 641GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1 0.7 0.1 0.1 4.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 127 Write 90.1 Mixed 112 SusWrite 1.4 103% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 65%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 0.9 0.8 0.1 0.1 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 135 Write 98 Mixed 115 SusWrite 1.4 108% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 65%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 350GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 151 149 149 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 157 Write 127 Mixed 88.9 SusWrite 148 172% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 62%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 450GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 73 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 113 Write 110 Mixed 92.4 SusWrite 72.1 129% 97 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 47%
WDC WD40 EMRX-82UZ0N0 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 789GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 142 142 142 141 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 130 Write 132 Mixed 111 SusWrite 142 176% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 63%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 831GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 72 74 74 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 94.4 Write 74.5 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 71.8 110% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 72 74 74 74 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 155 Write 105 Mixed 120 SusWrite 72.1 145% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA MG03ACA400 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 144 148 147 147 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 124 Write 121 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 144 152% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3200 4x8GB 561 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 24.8 MC Mixed 38.9 98% 34.3 GB/s	SC Read 28.7 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 38.6 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $25

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,661x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,294x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,429x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,248x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,841x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	773x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $112Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $850

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16