Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '20 at 04:37
Run Duration	367 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 81.5 1-Core 153 2-Core 302 96% 179 Pts	4-Core 546 8-Core 912 89% 729 Pts	64-Core 1,171 72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217 72,993 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Gigabyte(1458 2318) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Lighting 75.8 Reflection 55.9 Parallax 125 62% 85.5 fps	MRender 54 Gravity 76.1 Splatting 74.8 57% 68.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 482GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 103 174 107 104 104 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,464 Write 1,349 Mixed 1,022 SusWrite 231 227% 1,017 MB/s	4K Read 57.1 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 76.9 264% 94.7 MB/s	DQ Read 579 DQ Write 753 DQ Mixed 272 315% 535 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 255%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 549GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 91 90 92 91 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 91 Write 85.2 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 91 111% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.2 45% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 380GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 87 86 86 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 73 Write 61.6 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 86 97% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.7 227% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 59%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 913GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 93 87 86 90 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 110 Write 107 Mixed 82.8 SusWrite 89.2 130% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 74%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 92 87 86 90 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 136 Write 150 Mixed 103 SusWrite 89.1 160% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 213% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 74%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 7.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 180 184 173 172 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 178 Write 189 Mixed 117 SusWrite 176 223% 165 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.2 212% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 74%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 50 50 51 51 51 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 127 Write 83 Mixed 105 SusWrite 51 117% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 65%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 641GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 50 50 51 51 51 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 129 Write 92.9 Mixed 109 SusWrite 50.9 123% 95.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 65%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 50 50 51 51 51 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 132 Write 93.5 Mixed 112 SusWrite 50.9 125% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 65%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 350GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 150 154 151 153 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 156 Write 124 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 150 172% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 62%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 450GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 73 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 116 Write 109 Mixed 86.6 SusWrite 72.1 127% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 47%
WDC WD40 EMRX-82UZ0N0 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 789GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 142 142 142 141 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 132 Write 132 Mixed 111 SusWrite 142 177% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 63%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 831GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 72 71 74 74 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 93.9 Write 92.6 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 72 115% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 120% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 71 75 74 75 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 148 Write 114 Mixed 117 SusWrite 72.4 147% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA MG03ACA400 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 144 141 148 147 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	56% Above average	Read 117 Write 124 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 143 153% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3200 4x8GB 561 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 38.3 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 28.7 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 38.6 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $25

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,661x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,294x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,429x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,248x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,841x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	773x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $112Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $850

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16