MSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7737
MotherboardMSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 18:10
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 689
61% 515 Pts
64-Core 1,278
79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000
Nvidia(10DE 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41% Average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 58
37% 57.5 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 59.6
49% 59.6 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 41%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 447 455 465 418 397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 877
Write 938
Mixed 625
SusWrite 435
161% 719 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 41.7
150% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 478
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 362
275% 375 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 125%
Great: 230%
Adaptec Array 12TB
913GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 452 436 417 430 421 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 53% Great: 115%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$236
75GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 206 198 179 141 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 204
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 186
125% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.4
314% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 138%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01K01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 88 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 161
Write 137
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 87.5
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HUS728T8TALE6L4 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: W410
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 154 154 148 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 212
Mixed 114
SusWrite 152
124% 168 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 1.7
409% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 137%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$236
374GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 172 171 171 172 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 118
Write 123
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 172
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.5
312% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 138%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$236
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 171 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 149
Write 150
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 171
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.4
306% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX3M4X21 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 42.3
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 113%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737) Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737) - $305

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $954
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback