MSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7737
MotherboardMSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737)  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '20 at 18:20
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 170
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 690
60% 512 Pts
64-Core 1,280
79% 1,280 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000
Nvidia(10DE 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.9% Average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 58.5
38% 58.3 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 60.1
49% 60.2 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 441 456 461 485 472 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 877
Write 949
Mixed 583
SusWrite 458
161% 717 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 41.1
145% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 435
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 340
257% 349 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 124%
Great: 230%
Adaptec Array 12TB
913GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 502 461 442 430 436 434 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 53% Great: 115%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
75GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 204 194 181 139 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 200
Mixed 92
SusWrite 184
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.5
319% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 138%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01K01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 106 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 164
Write 140
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 105
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HUS728T8TALE6L4 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: W410
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 155 154 148 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 212
Mixed 120
SusWrite 152
126% 171 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 1.8
402% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 102%
Great: 137%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
374GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 171 172 171 171 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 115
Write 124
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 172
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.5
312% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 138%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 171 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 154
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 172
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.6
324% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX3M4X21 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 47.9
MC Write 44.3
MC Mixed 40.6
126% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.9
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 110%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737) Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737) - $305

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $945
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback