TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Latitude E5470

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E5470  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0M7NDK
Memory3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161222
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 14:14
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 151
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 229
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 58.3%
 Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Dell(1028 06DE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4326
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 6.03
5% 7.07 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 12.9
7% 8.41 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.94%
 Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 500GB-$258
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 266 237 263 208 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.5% Very good
Read 284
Write 278
Mixed 214
SusWrite 239
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 28.1
102% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 247
210% 308 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 72.5%
 Great: 115%
ASMT 2115 120GB
59GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 20 21 20 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 35
Write 34.5
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 20.7
42% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 9.3
755% 9.83 MB/s
DQ Read 10.2
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 11.6
922% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 48.4%
 Great: 185%
ASMT 2115 120GB
32GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 21 20 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
46% Average
Read 27.3
Write 33.8
Mixed 34
SusWrite 20.6
40% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 8.4
709% 9 MB/s
DQ Read 9.4
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 11.4
912% 11.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 46%
 Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CKHIWDFSEG Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.8% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 20.5
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 62.8%
 Great: 74%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Latitude E5470 Builds (Compare 3,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5470

CPU
Core i5-6300UIntelBench 40%, 59,619 samples1,285x
Core i7-6820HQIntelBench 60%, 33,920 samples488x
Core i5-6440HQIntelBench 66%, 4,172 samples456x
GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples2,051x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples1,037x
Radeon R7 M360AMDBench 6%, 820 samples8x
SSD
hynix SC308 SATA 256GBSKBench 69%, 6,224 samples119x
X400 M.2 2280 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 11,716 samples115x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples112x
RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples563x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples349x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GBMicronBench 39%, 4,454 samples279x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback