Asus P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '17 at 18:14
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 116
2-Core 236
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 599
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1517 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.3% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 110
Parallax 101
84% 105 fps
MRender 93.5
Gravity 95.3
Splatting 80
72% 89.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blaze 120GB-$30
36GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 326
Write 109
Mixed 155
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 3.27
62% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 2.11
16% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 66%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 362
Write 117
Mixed 175
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 6.28
72% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 38.7
37% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 8394 991770 (996770) 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 8394 991770 (996770) 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3 Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback