Asrock H77 Pro4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H77 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	14.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '20 at 09:10
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 78 1-Core 104 2-Core 178 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 497 52% 418 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 112,731 User benchmarks, average bench 83% PowerColor(148C 2402) Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 95.7 Parallax 187 95% 133 fps	MRender 97.3 Gravity 110 Splatting 137 96% 115 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 77 76 74 77 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.5% Average	Read 236 Write 74.5 Mixed 95.5 SusWrite 75.6 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 18.6 71% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 77.3 DQ Mixed 81.4 72% 111 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 121%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70 66,332 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 930GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 189 201 197 191 196 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 142 Write 117 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 194 87% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 2 368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 111%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 23GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 37 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 34.2 Mixed 26 SusWrite 36.8 45% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 51264Y133I 0702 51264Y133I Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 029E CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 20GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.2% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 5.9 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 6.7 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 84.3 47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	36x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	28x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x
X3 240GBTcsunbowBench 78%, 3,491 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	6x
PSD38G13332 1x8GBPatriotBench 26%, 879 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16