Asus ZenBook UX433FN_UX433FN

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus ZenBook UX433FN_UX433FN (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK UX433FN
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '20 at 05:34
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	8%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 85 2-Core 194 67% 119 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 381 38% 309 Pts	64-Core 397 25% 397 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1B2E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	5.74% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 14.5 Parallax 6.09 5% 8.83 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 5.83 Splatting 12.4 8% 8.76 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.74% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 203 191 180 175 177 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 803 Write 605 Mixed 515 SusWrite 200 118% 531 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 33.2 113% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 617 DQ Write 63.2 DQ Mixed 109 138% 263 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 187%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 34 33 33 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 35.5 Write 24.2 Mixed 28 SusWrite 33.2 40% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 61%
SDXC Card 512GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 477GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 33 33 33 34 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 32 Write 35.8 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 32.8 44% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.3 210% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT52L512M32D2PF-09 2x4GB 6,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	68.5% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 21.6 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 18.8 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZenBook UX433FN_UX433FN Builds (Compare 286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook UX433FN_UX433FN

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	211x
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	75x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	201x
MX150-2NvidiaBench 11%, 5,332 samples	85x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 141%, 4,269 samples	139x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	45x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ2 512GBKingstonBench 102%, 457 samples	45x

RAM
MT52L1G32D4PG-093 2x8GBMicronBench 66%, 14,288 samples	162x
K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GBSamsungBench 68%, 8,402 samples	97x
MT52L512M32D2PF-09 2x4GBMicronBench 67%, 6,726 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48