Asus K55VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus K55VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55VM
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 09 '20 at 22:40
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 142
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 202
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1447) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2653
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 2.66
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 7.22
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
548GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 377 388 421 423 402 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 444
Write 435
Mixed 352
SusWrite 390
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 29.6
98% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 255
216% 316 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 121%
TOSHIBA- TR150 480GB
117GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 195 117 180 200 72 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
178% Outstanding
Read 248
Write 248
Mixed 188
SusWrite 156
279% 210 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 22
1,967% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20.9
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 24.9
2,292% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 178%
Great: 293%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
243GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 59 77 53 34 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 87.1
Write 87.6
Mixed 31
SusWrite 56.9
85% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K55VM Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K55VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback