Asus N3150I-C

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus N3150I-C (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '20 at 22:34
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	CYP-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3150 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 26% FCBGA15, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 36.3 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 41 21% 32.6 Pts	4-Core 73.1 8-Core 69.2 10% 71.1 Pts	64-Core 77.6 5% 77.6 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8576) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.84% Terrible	Lighting 4.53 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 4.34 4% 4.42 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.84% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB 26,886 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 112 64 65 98 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 418 Write 268 Mixed 305 SusWrite 124 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 20.1 77% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 139 104% 137 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 137 143 144 139 134 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 88 Write 125 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 138 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 90%
SAMSUNG MZ7PD256 256GB 238GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 320 309 327 337 312 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	160% Outstanding	Read 283 Write 246 Mixed 231 SusWrite 312 364% 268 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 14.2 1,064% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 16.4 DQ Write 27.6 DQ Mixed 20.5 1,697% 21.5 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB 1,154 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.8% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 10.3 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 220 18% 220 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N3150I-C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus N3150I-C

CPU
Celeron N3150IntelBench 26%, 3,131 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	1x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 33%, 1,255 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $26

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16