TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8H61/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H61/USB3  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110407
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 09 '20 at 09:23
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$199
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 187
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 470
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 75.7%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 311.06
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 0.56
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 1.96
2% 2.04 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.35%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 82 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 85.8
Write 87.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 78.7
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 47.3%
 Great: 70%
Seagate ST3160211AS 160GB
102GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 64 68 67 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 12.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 65.2
32% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 37.6%
 Great: 40%
WDC WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH 240GB
132GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.4% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 24.8
Mixed 9
SusWrite 28
30% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.6
90% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 13.4%
 Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 29.8%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8H61/USB3 Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H61/USB3

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel  $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples22x
Core i5-2400Intel  $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples16x
Core i7-2600Intel  $199Bench 67%, 185,630 samples15x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples11x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples8x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples8x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples7x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples5x
SU650 120GBAdata  $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples5x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples5x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 45%, 7,510 samples4x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX  $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $279
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback