Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 01:26
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 449
54% 414 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 7.56
6% 8.67 fps
MRender 0.14
Gravity 6.57
Splatting 15.6
7% 7.44 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180831a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 117 117 115 117 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 413
Write 118
Mixed 170
SusWrite 116
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 24.3
113% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 30
DQ Mixed 71.9
53% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
177GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 26 27 29 30 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 124
Write 29.3
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 28.2
37% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX4M1A2133C15 04CB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 19.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback