TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH87MC
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 19:22
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 184
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 358
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 75%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36BE)
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 45.8
Reflection 44.8
Parallax 40.2
37% 43.6 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 36.3
32% 39 fps
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 35.4%
 Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 21GB
17GB free
Firmware: .251
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 92 102 92 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.6% Good
Read 465
Write 118
Mixed 164
SusWrite 95.1
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 29.3
117% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 91.2
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 29.3
43% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 64.6%
 Great: 65%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
560GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 127 140 154 150 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 158
Write 127
Mixed 84
SusWrite 142
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 86.2%
 Great: 108%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
43GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 84 86 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 85.3
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 86.4
56% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 50.3%
 Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 99U5584-003.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 59%
 Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples2,045x
Core i7-2600Intel  $137Bench 67%, 185,630 samples1,580x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples941x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples1,056x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples457x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples431x
RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples519x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples379x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples298x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback