Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 14:01
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 88.1
1-Core 80
2-Core 134
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 157
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2828
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 1.62
Parallax 1.31
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.22
2% 2.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 205 211 197 219 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.5% Very good
Read 248
Write 225
Mixed 223
SusWrite 206
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 39.6
128% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 174
137% 190 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
523GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 160 162 158 171 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 146
Write 134
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 161
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF KVR13N9S8/4 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX R2.0 Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback