Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 13:25
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 454
59% 446 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.00.17
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.3% Average
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 64.6
38% 57.8 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 49
Splatting 52.8
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD120 120GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2019
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 469
Write 360
Mixed 6.7
61% 279 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 6.5
24% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
209GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 114 108 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 105
Write 114
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 112
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1542WS.002 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.9
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.9
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2V 2.0 Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback