Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '20 at 22:42
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 77.8 1-Core 142 2-Core 285 90% 168 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 819 84% 679 Pts	64-Core 1,065 66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 5700 XT 2,287 User benchmarks, average bench 96% Asus(1043 04E2) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.3% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 44.4 Parallax 240 114% 141 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 27 Splatting 53.4 51% 64.3 fps
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 103%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 331 330 329 329 327 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	271% Outstanding	Read 2527 Write 1,465 Mixed 1,075 SusWrite 371 300% 1,360 MB/s	4K Read 68.4 4K Write 194 4K Mixed 92.7 325% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 975 DQ Write 1,135 DQ Mixed 1,012 774% 1,041 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 271% Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 858GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 839 842 841 839 687 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 229GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1201 868 866 866 874 870 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	323% Outstanding	Read 2,628 Write 1,576 Mixed 1,736 SusWrite 924 382% 1,716 MB/s	4K Read 71.6 4K Write 177 4K Mixed 98.1 328% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 1,372 DQ Write 1,312 DQ Mixed 1,326 1,000% 1,337 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 323% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2666 C18 4x16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.6% Very good	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 32.4 82% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 32.3 70% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $25

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,310x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	875x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	838x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	573x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	518x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	407x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	274x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	143x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $851

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16