Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150602
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '20 at 21:54
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$41 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 92.6 2-Core 152 69% 112 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 260 34% 256 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 20 18% 19.6 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 16.7 17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$71 31,280 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427ANR SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 376 381 401 404 395 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 431 Write 370 Mixed 379 SusWrite 391 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 51.7 156% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 283 231% 329 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 127%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 31GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 27GB free Firmware: PMAP SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 17 17 18 18 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 59.1 Write 52.1 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 18 26% 36 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 2 514% 3 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 41%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 31GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 29GB free Firmware: PMAP SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Write 27 SusWrite 17.7 16% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 408% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 655GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 122 119 122 122 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 137 Write 94.3 Mixed 79.6 SusWrite 121 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 113%
Generic MassStorageClass 8GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 0745 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.6 4.9 4.4 5.1 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	4.3% Terrible	Read 18 Write 2.7 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 4.6 7% 7.03 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.3% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0420 DDR3 1600 0420 DDR3 1600 12GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.4% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 10.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	133x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	97x
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	58x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	57x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	36x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16