Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 14:17
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 201
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 466
51% 405 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Gigabyte(1458 3FBF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77% Very good
Lighting 98.7
Reflection 89.5
Parallax 43.2
80% 77.2 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 85.8
Splatting 76.7
70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 447
Mixed 378
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 45.9
148% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 363
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
101GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 101 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 117
Write 94.5
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 100
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 114%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 90 96 78 57 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 124
Write 118
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 91.3
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 32.5
Write 26.8
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 19.2
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 105%
StoreJet Transcend 3TB
311GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 32
Write 26
Mixed 26
SusWrite 19.2
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77-DS3H Builds (Compare 1,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback