Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 07:13
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 258
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 808
81% 657 Pts
64-Core 968
60% 968 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 96.9
Reflection 107
Parallax 99.2
79% 101 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 94.1
Splatting 89.5
87% 110 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 539 166 54 52 53 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 408
Write 590
Mixed 303
SusWrite 149
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 44.1
142% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 328
251% 340 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 435%
SSK 512GB
250GB free
Firmware: 0206
SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 551 544 494 488 497 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 447
Mixed 465
SusWrite 520
109% 483 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 36.7
121% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 169
121% 155 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96%
Great: 91%
CalDigit Card Reader 125GB
74GB free, PID 0747
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 106 106 105 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
Read 143
Write 100
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 106
132% 103 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1
81% 4 MB/s
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 90 91 88 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 81.2
Write 92
Mixed 58
SusWrite 91.6
111% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 28.7
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 27.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback