Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 07:31
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 159
2-Core 316
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,094
101% 846 Pts
64-Core 1,740
108% 1,740 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Asus(1043 8711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.6% Good
Lighting 78.4
Reflection 90.7
Parallax 73.6
64% 80.9 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 103
80% 98.1 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 458 450 458 461 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 610
Write 724
Mixed 601
SusWrite 460
135% 599 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 58.4
193% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,327
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 852
732% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 166%
Great: 262%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
688GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 90 90 89 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 110
Write 108
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 89.2
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
726GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 143 144 142 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 151
Mixed 84
SusWrite 142
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 114%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00L4HB0 1TB
398GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 124 124 123 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 83.2
Write 86.7
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 122
122% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 58%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00L4HB0 1TB
827GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 124 124 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 135
Write 137
Mixed 85
SusWrite 122
160% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-4266C19-8GTRG 04CD F4-3600C17-8GTZR 04CD F4-4266C19-8GTRG 04CD F4-3600C17-8GTZR 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
113% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 33.7
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 49.2
SC Mixed 33.6
101% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 47.6
84% 47.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,046
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback