Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 02:33
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 196
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 719
66% 555 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 83.6
54% 72.7 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 57
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 156 89 177 186 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 422
Mixed 158
SusWrite 166
219% 299 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 1.6
446% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 178%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA42UI-MIC1U22T2 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 30.6
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 27.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $83

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback