Asus N55SF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus N55SF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N55SF
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110829
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 01:44
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 157
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 376
42% 329 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Asus(1043 2050) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.12
Parallax 1.78
5% 4.93 fps
MRender 8.14
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 8.09
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 84 92 110 109 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 99.2
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 103
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 71%
SD Card 8GB
7GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 8.5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 16.4
17% 13 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
89% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N55SF Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N55SF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback