Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 04 '20 at 22:22
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 590
66% 517 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1367 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 73.5
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 86.2
60% 76.4 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 72.8
Splatting 58.7
55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 53%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
16GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 130 155 156 146 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 442
Write 91.1
Mixed 120
SusWrite 138
43% 198 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 18.4
68% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 26.4
DQ Mixed 56.6
67% 124 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 76%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 241 236 230 243 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.4% Good
Read 255
Write 126
Mixed 222
SusWrite 238
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 33.8
108% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 124%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB
7GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 64 65 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 60
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 62.7
44% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 68%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
108GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 139 126 139 157 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 165
Write 154
Mixed 107
SusWrite 147
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 99%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
12GB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 69 90 93 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 50.1
Write 109
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 80.4
98% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.7
275% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $282
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback