Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 22:26
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 583
65% 510 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 82.9
58% 73.4 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 55.2
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 53%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
16GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 156 156 147 139 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 458
Write 142
Mixed 202
SusWrite 146
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 20
77% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 84.4
84% 142 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 76%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 149 103 92 77 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.7% Good
Read 255
Write 239
Mixed 221
SusWrite 123
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 34.2
109% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 199
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 124%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB
8GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 60 67 23 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 71
Write 64.7
Mixed 54
SusWrite 54.8
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 68%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
111GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 160 168 169 168 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 11.8
Write 53.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 167
46% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 99%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
12GB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 89 87 91 89 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 59
Write 132
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 88.8
119% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 1
319% 3.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 8.1
DQ Mixed 1.1
314% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $368
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback