Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '17 at 03:03
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 143
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 443
45% 364 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1336 MHz, MLim: 2047 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 87
60% 76.5 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 57.8
53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 510
Write 383
Mixed 409
96% 434 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 19.8
106% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 36.8
DQ Write 59.8
DQ Mixed 48.9
37% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 141
Mixed 129
115% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.25
106% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback