Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '17 at 23:41
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 147
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 456
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2090 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 85.4
0% 51.4 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 56.2
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 495
Write 383
Mixed 401
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 20.4
107% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 20.3
47% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 124
Write 142
Mixed 131
100% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.58
4K Mixed 0.29
115% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 86%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
55GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 243
Write 161
Mixed 147
219% 184 MB/s
4K Read 9.47
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 4.68
548% 8.18 MB/s
DQ Read 11.5
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 4.93
594% 9.24 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback