User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '17 at 23:43
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 601
64% 512 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 6755) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.29% Terrible
Lighting 7.63
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 7.41
6% 8.85 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.57
Splatting 15.7
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.29%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 1,281
Write 299
Mixed 469
148% 683 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 12.7
100% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 75.1
DQ Mixed 12.1
20% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 144%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.4
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback