Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive372% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '20 at 13:48
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 159
2-Core 315
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1,205
107% 905 Pts
64-Core 2,228
138% 2,228 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 450.99
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.7% Average
Lighting 46
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 43.1
38% 47.4 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 46
Splatting 60
47% 57.2 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1930 1925 1948 1778 1760 1593 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 2,729
Write 1,897
Mixed 1,027
SusWrite 1,822
416% 1,869 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 81.3
299% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,317
DQ Write 1,372
DQ Mixed 1,147
917% 1,279 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 372%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
145GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 457 463 464 465 465 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 454
Mixed 371
SusWrite 462
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 47.8
164% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 202
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
551GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2057 2059 1532 1465 1524 1571 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,654
Write 1,940
Mixed 1,866
SusWrite 1,701
457% 2,040 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 98.7
329% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,570
DQ Write 1,541
DQ Mixed 1,557
1,169% 1,556 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 381%
Great: 410%
Seagate ST6000VN0041-2EL11C 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 110 107 99 105 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 109%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
345GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 131 131 132 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 125
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 131
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 57 46 56 60 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 53.6
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 48.8
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 44.6
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 134%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback