Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '17 at 21:35
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7670K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 74.7
39% 58.8 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 128
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 38.2
13% 28.7 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 37.2
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 480
Write 255
Mixed 271
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 22.7
93% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 98.9
DQ Mixed 48.9
62% 114 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8G F3-1600C11-8G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ 32GB
1600, 1600, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 15.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback