Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '17 at 02:55
Run Duration	90 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7670K APU (2014 D.Ka) 1,733 User benchmarks, average bench 47% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 63 1-Core 34.4 2-Core 63.7 36% 53.7 Pts	4-Core 96.4 8-Core 101 13% 98.6 Pts	64-Core 106 6% 106 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.1% Below average	Lighting 40.1 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 38.2 33% 36.5 fps	MRender 39.3 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 36.4 31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1287 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 112 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 47 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 93 (F1) Unknown 99 99 720336019	73.4% Very good	Read 477 Write 257 Mixed 271 74% 335 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 23.6 107% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 49.5 63% 116 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8G F3-1600C11-8G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600, 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.5% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 14.7 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 11 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	43x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	34x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	34x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	22x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,795 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $163

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48