MSI 870-C45 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870-C45 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '17 at 18:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B40
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 88.5
44% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 177
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
PwrHis(1787 2312) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 11
Parallax 13
12% 13 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.6
10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP580 120GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.6% Poor
Read 205
Write 121
Mixed 119
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 2.47
30% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 3.46
6% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
30GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 76.8
Write 75.1
Mixed 30
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KF9 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-C45 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870-C45 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback