HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 21:16
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 379
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310
Device(1B0A 9060) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.24% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.48 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2
2% 1.88 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.24%
Great: 1%
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4300
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 6.66
0% 4.43 fps
MRender 8.48
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.04
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 23 33 3.5 2.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Read 4.8
Write 4.3
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 15.3
6% 7.55 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 76%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
495GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 121 123 122 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 116
Write 120
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 121
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 77%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 320GB
113GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
38% Below average
Read 86.2
Write 19.2
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 88.1
78% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 51734xxxx78x6523xx Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Micron 9KSF25672AZ-1G6K1 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback