ADD TO PC
BUILD

Monster TULPAR T5 V19.1

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V19.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V19.1
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190416
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '20 at 16:51
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 82.7 1-Core 134 2-Core 264 88% 160 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 777 78% 635 Pts	64-Core 897 56% 897 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Lighting 93.4 Reflection 85.5 Parallax 75.1 76% 84.7 fps	MRender 97.5 Gravity 77.2 Splatting 68.7 65% 81.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7201Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,867 Write 725 Mixed 983 261% 1,192 MB/s	4K Read 54.7 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 72.7 242% 83.9 MB/s	DQ Read 971 DQ Write 1,137 DQ Mixed 1,030 783% 1,046 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 249%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 237GB 3,335 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 29GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 127 120 123 127 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 418 Write 336 Mixed 151 SusWrite 146 58% 263 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 33.5 4K Mixed 12 61% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 80.1 DQ Write 33 DQ Mixed 16.4 23% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 21.9 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 24.5 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical TULPAR T5 V19.1 Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 46%

Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V19.1

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	224x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	127x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	97x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	33x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	17x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $59Bench 213%, 34,063 samples	16x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	89x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	59x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $36	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback