HP hp workstation xw6200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive2.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP hp workstation xw6200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 08B8h
Memory2.1 GB free of 4.00049 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '17 at 14:44
Run Duration580 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 2.80GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 21.1
2-Core 40.5
30% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 43.4
8-Core 44.6
6% 44 Pts
64-Core 45.4
3% 45.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
XFX(1682 304A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.59 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.42 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
2.6% Terrible
Read 3.07
Write 2.73
Mixed 2.58
1% 2.79 MB/s
4K Read 2.11
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 2.3
7% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 2.6%
Great: 115%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
15GB free, PID 5571, sandisc sdcz33
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 3.44
Mixed 6.8
10% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 1.18
69% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 33280 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hp workstation xw6200 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw6200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback