Asus X99-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-S  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141114
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '17 at 12:43
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 245
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 789
78% 637 Pts
64-Core 974
60% 974 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 194
Parallax 174
145% 182 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 171
Splatting 136
118% 144 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 128%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 495
Write 190
Mixed 222
66% 303 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 14.9
86% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 39.5
61% 113 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$22
567GB free
Firmware: SN04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 156
Mixed 158
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
143% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM 2200 MHz clocked @ 2333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 34.9
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 21.4
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-S Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $799
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback