Lenovo 2342CTO

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 2342CTO (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2342CTO
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190807
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '20 at 10:53
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220 14,369 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 84.9 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 172 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 390 42% 332 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 23.1 Parallax 18.8 16% 20.6 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 20 Splatting 26.1 20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 130 129 1.5 129 1.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 463 Write 393 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 65.5 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 102%
Toshiba MK5076GSX 500GB-$54 7,200 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 288GB free Firmware: GS001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 64 64 64 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 65.8 Write 63.7 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 64.3 38% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer 2GB 438 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3 3 2.9 3 3.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	8.05% Terrible	Read 15.8 Write 1.5 Mixed 4 SusWrite 2.9 6% 6.05 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 71% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.05% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB 40,451 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.6% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 6 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 2342CTO Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2342CTO

CPU
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples	15x
Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples	12x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	6x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	37x
NVS 5400MNvidiaBench 4%, 1,652 samples	8x

SSD
SU635 480GBAdata $40Bench 71%, 5,092 samples	3x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	2x
PM830 128GBSamsungBench 61%, 13,767 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	4x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	4x
16JTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 12GBMicronBench 44%, 5 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 30% - Poor

Total price: $40

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16