Medion ERAZER X5360 D MD8788/2412

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMedion ERAZER X5360 D MD8788/2412  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7848
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 17:40
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 104
2-Core 182
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 565
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 57.5
48% 60.3 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 51.6
47% 59 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT0101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 51 51 53 61 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47% Average
Read 402
Write 58.2
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 55.2
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 20.1
76% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 22.3
DQ Mixed 32.2
40% 75.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
83GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 87.5
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 93.7
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 994050 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ERAZER X5360 D MD8788/2412 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Medion ERAZER X5360 D MD8788/2412

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback